1. Award Explanation:
   

   This award encourages companies to regard innovation as their important mission, establish innovative capabilities and effectively integrate these innovations into product and service systems. The company must be able to collaborate with customers to cooperatively develop and innovate, and establish close relationships with their upstream and downstream suppliers and partners to achieve common growth goals. Besides the innovation and development of new products and services, other innovative values affecting the company’s internal and external environment, as well as in key sales markets and customers should be created.

2. Evaluation Criteria:
   

1. Award Explanation:
   

   This award is divided into two major components: transparency and integrity. The first evaluates a company’s degree of disclosure for corporate governance procedures, thereby establishing fair and objective practices; the latter evaluates the extent to which companies fulfills their commitments to corporate governance, as well as their means and clarity in disclosing negative information.

2. Evaluation Criteria:
   

1. Award Explanation:
   

   This award follows the GRI G4 standards for corporate sustainability in supply chain management operations, with the aim of encouraging corporate senior management levels to set sustainable supply chain management strategies and clear objectives; determine guidelines for selecting suppliers; establish supplier risk/impact assessment mechanisms for a comprehensive description of the supply chain and relation changes between the company and the supplier; grasp actual or potential negative effects and impacts of suppliers, to then consider whether to provide supplier guidance or to terminate contracts; inform corrective action and provide streamlined activities to ensure business operation stability and continuous performance growth.

2. Evaluation Criteria:
   
   

1. Award Explanation:
   

   This award follows the GRI G4 and CSR FOR HR (Cohen, 2010) standards for staff related activities, while referring to the 2014 SAP Integrated Report (IR) regarding staff development. Founded in Germany, SAP is one of the largest software corporations in Europe, and their research indicates that the corporation’s staff development index metrics directly affect the earnings and profitability. For example, every 1% change in the corporation’s health index affects the percentile of women in senior management positions, employees’ commitment and participation, and customer loyalty, thus influencing the earnings and profitability.

2. Evaluation Criteria:
   

1. Award Explanation:
   

   This award follows the Social Inclusion Principles for Australia published by the Australian Government, referring to the company’s responsibility to include in their operational strategies measures designed to meet the needs of disadvantaged groups as clients and customers through supply end business models, incorporating them in the value chain. The model should therefore aim at fostering core corporate objectives and visions of shared inclusivity values, ensuring mutual benefit between the company and society needs.

2. Evaluation Criteria:
   
   
3. Supplement:

    2. The 4^th evaluation criteria should improve the institutional performance and provide as many details as possible regarding the government's, media reports and beneficiaries' response.

1. Award Explanation:
   

   This award recognizes proactive corporations that actively establish climate change and water resource supply and demand assessment and responsive measures, implement water resource management and adaptive plans, construct sustainable and safe water system facilities, disclose water footprint and reduction performances; promote green economy and industry, as a reference point for stakeholders.

2. Evaluation Criteria:
   

1. Award Explanation:
   

   This award is modeled after Australia’s “Banksia Leadership in the Circular Economy Award”, which encourages and recognizes corporate efforts that develop the economy while protecting and preserving natural resources, optimizing resource reutilization, emphasizing recycling, enhanced recycling, alternative business models, closed-loop management, innovative applications in commercial models or technologies, generating substantial economic, environmental, and social efficacy throughout the supply chain.

2. Evaluation Criteria:
   
   

This award follows the information security awards evaluation indicators of various well-known domestic and international institutions, aiming to: encourage corporations to strengthen the corporate information security awareness; enhance information security technical capabilities; integrate and strengthen information security management systems, to continuously monitor and review management performance while implementing the concept of information security management and business continuity.
2. Evaluation Criteria:

3. Supplement:
    1. The 1^st evaluation criteria includes "Information Security Management Policies"; "Human Resources and Staff Information Security Management and Compliance"; "Supplier Information Security Management and Performance".
     2. The 2^nd evaluation criteria includes "Online Security Control"; "Information Asset Management"; " Security Access Control"; "Physical and Environmental Security".

   3. The 3^rd evaluation criteria includes "Operational Safety and Daily Information Security Management"; "Information Security Incident Notification Management"; "Constant Management Operation".

Universities serve the role of fostering new talents, thereby fulfilling the following social responsibilities: making good use of school resources; assisting local development; proposing possible innovative solutions; becoming a local sustainable development coordinator to exert a positive social influence. This award encourages universities to apply, including those who have implemented the Ministry of Education’s USR Practice Program. These programs may include but are not limited to “local care”; “industrial promotion”; “environmental sustainability”; “health promotion”.

 Evaluation Criteria:



Best Sustainability Project Awards - Hospital (NEW)

According to the 2006 WHO self-assessment manual, a “Health Promoting Hospital” is defined as: a hospital that not only provides high-quality and comprehensive medical and nursing services, but also develops a corporate identity that is closely integrated with health promoting goals; develops health promoting organizational structures that include participation between patients and employees. The “Best Sustainability Project Awards –Hospital” aims to reward domestic medical hospitals for their health promoting spirit and development of medical-related sustainable programs that promote international or domestic community medical care, providing a friendly and respectful healing environment for patients as well as preventive health and integrated care services.
2. Evaluation Criteria:

Assessing Corporate Sustainability Reports information disclosure, credibility and communication effectiveness (65%), and online corporate social media information disclosure (35%).